Showing 3331 - 3340 of 3349 for "North Carolina" with applied filters
01 September 2018 by Managing Intellectual Property
Early this year, the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property issued decisions denying registration for the trade mark PINCHE GRINGO BBQ & Design in classes 43 (restaurants) and 30 (sauces)
01 September 2018 by Karen Artz Ash
In the last few years, the US Supreme Court has held that laches is not an available defense to claims for copyright or patent infringement brought within the limited periods described under each of the Copyright and Patent Acts
02 July 2018 by Managing Intellectual Property
CRISPR technology enables genes to be edited and can eventually treat diseases caused by gene mutations.
02 July 2018 by Managing Intellectual Property
In Mexico, droit moral is attached to the author and is inalienable, does not expire, cannot be waived and cannot be encumbered. The author and his/her heirs can enforce this right.
02 July 2018 by Karen Artz Ash
Although it is the general policy of the USPTO’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) to suspend opposition proceedings when the parties to such proceedings become involved in a civil action which may be dispositive of the case, a recent decision issued by the US District Court for the District of Delaware in Tigercat Int’l, Inc. v Caterpillar Inc. indicates that there are circumstances where, conversely, federal courts will stay a litigation pending a TTAB ruling.
01 June 2018 by Mark Davis
Trade mark owners should feel encouraged by the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision to enforce an agreement to prevent grey marketing (or parallel importing) in Mars Canada Inc v Bemco Cash & Carry Inc.
01 June 2018 by Managing Intellectual Property
It has become common practice for parties of any administrative proceeding to ask the Institute of Industrial Property to require a third party, not related to the proceeding, or even its counterpart, to respond to several questions raised by the offeror of the proof.
01 June 2018 by Karen Artz Ash
The US Supreme Court’s ruling in B&B Hardware, Inc v Hargis Industries, Inc provided that courts were obligated to give preclusive effect to decisions made by the US Patent and Trademark Office’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) if the ordinary elements of issue preclusion are met
14 May 2018 by Kingsley Egbuonu
This roundup features Antequera Parilli & Rodriguez, Arochi & Lindner, Bardehle Pagenberg, DWF, FisherBroyles, HGF, J A Kemp, Kirkland & Ellis, Lewis Silkin, Marks & Clerk, Pinsent Masons and Santarelli
17 January 2018 by Kingsley Egbuonu
Shumaker Loop & Kendrick merger, new Hogan Lovells board chair, Sterpi joins Gianni Origoni Grippo Cappelli & Partners, new head of IP at Vasil Kisil & Partners, JA Kemp opens Paris office, Reed Smith partner promotions, and Simmons & Simmons partner hires