Delhi-based Prosoll Law is a respected criminal law boutique, featuring three experienced advocates. Within the criminal law space, the firm handles all cases, ranging from anti-corruption matters, money laundering issues, regulatory disputes, white-collar crimes, frauds and economic offence-related litigation, constitutional challenge disputes and civil litigation. The firm works with a range of clientele that includes leading bureaucrats, politicians, government officials, former judges, high-net-worth individuals, business conglomerates, educational institutions, NGOs and start-ups.
Founder of the firm Harsh Sharma is the main contact. He is a respected criminal lawyer with several landmark judgments under his belt. His practice focuses on anti-corruption, economic offences, constitutional remedies, conventional crime, tort, service matters and alternative dispute resolution. Advocates Vaibhavi Sharma and Lakshya Parasher round out the team. The firm welcomed associate partner Arjit Benjamin in February 2023 from Law Offices of Panag & Babu. Prior to his stint there, he was a senior associate at Karanjawala & Co.
One ongoing work highlight has the team defending the co-founder and managing director of Micromax Informatics. Its client is accused of accepting a bribe for the unauthorised construction of a banquet hall. The team devised a unique litigation strategy to put forth crucial issues of law with reference to the allegedly incriminating telephone conversations between the client and others accused, being the primary evidence. Three petitions were filed, two of which the High Court decided in favour of the firm’s client. The third is still pending adjudication.
Sharma has been engaged by a former Delhi High Court judge for his defence against allegations of bribery. The charge sheet registered against the client alleges his involvement in a land deal where he was believed to have misused his official capacity as a judge by accepting illegal gratification to pass a judgment. Challenges of the case included its high-profile nature as well as the numerous debates around the working pattern of judges and the immunities bestowed upon them under the Judges Protection Act.
