Poulus Ensom Smith is one of the newest entries to the crowded Vancouver litigation boutique pedestal and, in short order, “has really established itself in the market,” according to peers, with one noting, “I have referred numerous files to them over the year – mostly commercial matters (shareholder disputes, contract disputes, etc.)” The firm has generated a remarkable level of acclaim and testimonials from a vocal fan base of clients. “They assisted in resolving a complicated dispute involving many matters,” testifies one. “They were exceptional and skilled at resolving the matter with a favorable outcome.” Another confirms, “The firm has been acting for me in complex, high-stakes corporate litigation involving a closely held company, including shareholder oppression claims, governance deadlock, and the diversion and control of corporate assets. Their recent work includes preparing and advancing an appeal to the British Columbia Court of Appeal following a three-day chambers hearing, addressing issues of statutory interpretation, quorum and shareholder meeting requirements under the Business Corporations Act, and the court’s discretion to order shareholder meetings where governance has become impracticable. The matter also involves parallel proceedings, significant financial exposure, and cross-border considerations, requiring careful strategic and procedural management.”
While the firm as an entity is a relatively new entrant to the market, the firm’s primary founder and senior partner, however, is anything but a new name to the Canadian legal landscape. Hein Poulus is a longtime pillar of the Vancouver community. “Hein is the backbone of the firm,” asserts one client. “His experience and judgment are evident in every aspect of the work. He remains calm under pressure, consistently focuses on the merits and the facts, and brings clarity to complex and emotionally charged situations. He has an exceptional ability to cut through noise, maintain strategic perspective, and focus on what truly matters. His advocacy and judgment have been instrumental in securing important results, including successfully addressing time-bar issues raised by the opposing side. He is an outstanding lawyer and a trusted advisor.” Another offers, “Hein is one of the best commercial litigators in BC. He always provides practical advice combined with excellent legal services. [He has a] Photographic memory and is an exceptional strategist. [He has] The ability to see things or angles that others don't see and a strong history of successful case outcomes.” A client addresses
Joseph Ensom as “very hard working and driven. He is detailed and meticulous in planning and execution of litigation strategy. He cares about results and jumps on any assignment. He communicates well and has good judgment.” A peer and referral source insists, “I refer many files to Joe because I know the clients will be well served. Joe's legal skills are sharp. He is also a relentless advocate for his clients - he really tries to find the solution that best fits their needs and is on their team from the start. I have only had positive feedback from clients sent to him.” Laésha Smith has also amassed a substantial fan base among peers and clients for her securities-focused practice. “Laésha initially worked with the British Columbia Securities Commission when I first met her,” notes one contemporary. “Since leaving the commission, she has gained considerable experience in securities litigation matters.” A client weighs in, “Laésha’s communication is of great detail, her knowledge in how to litigate and move forward in a timely manner and her attention to detail is exceptional. I had the pleasure to watch her work in an examination for discoveries and she impressed. (May I also point out I fired my previous law firm handling this? They could not compare!) I have dealt with many lawyers in my lifetime, and Laésha is one off the best.” A client also raves on behalf of
Kyle Thompson, delivering fulsome praise: “Kyle was the lead on my case and drove strategy and implementation. He provided me with pros and cons of my choices, including choosing to do a hearing instead of settling the case with the Law Society. I am glad I chose a hearing and go to work with Kyle. He recognized how my case was distinguished from all other cases on similar issues that had come before a hearing panel. But more importantly, he communicated that with passion and conviction. The panel showed they were receptive to distinguishing this case even though the Law Society opposed this position. Kyle paid particular attention to the issue of jurisdiction of the hearing panel -- something that none of the lawyers I had retained before even considered. Kyle also had to explain areas of law that the Panel clearly did not understand. Kyle did so with patience, with use of case law, and with respect. Kyle did all that without sounding aggressive and without making the Panel dislike him (and in turn me). Kyle was the ultimate driver of creativity while staying credible with the Panel. He is crafty with his words and captivated the Panel's attention.”
Kelly Ann Maw is cheered by a client as “quietly efficient and highly competent. Her advice is well considered, thorough, and she works exceptionally hard to achieve positive outcomes for her clients.”
