Canada

Review

Dispute resolution
Bennett Jones

ALBERTA

The Calgary office of Bennett Jones is its historical headquarters and, while its operations across Canada have blossomed (and includes another, smaller, office in Edmonton), the firm remains a consistent key legacy player in this particular city. “Bennett Jones used to have all the ‘A clients’ in the Calgary market and, while other firms have since moved in and clients have spread out more, Bennett Jones still hangs on to some exclusive relationships. They are a steady and meaningful presence in the market, still attract premium work and have great people. Even with the recent retirement of [former litigation stars] Ken [Lenz] and Chris [Simard] going to the bench, it’s still such a deep team. Munaf Mohamed in particular attracts great clients.” Mohamed, a routinely acknowledged “trial warrior” who “doesn’t suffer fools,” led a multi-office team in representing a group of Saudi companies in advancing one of the largest fraud claims in Canada against a high-ranking former Minister of Cabinet in the former Saudi government who is alleged, along with a number of close family and friends, of embezzling a massive amount of money and moving it into various offshore havens and who, once stripped of his titles and position, fled to Canada. A worldwide freezing order has been obtained against the Minister, together with various other extraordinary orders. Another frequently championed trial lawyer, Blair Yorke-Slader, acts as lead trial counsel for the owners of a building in downtown Calgary in which the tenant leased virtually all of the building under a lease that ran until 2031. After a workforce reduction the tenant sought to reduce its lease burden by claiming breach of lease because of the alleged presence of trace amounts of asbestos in the fireproofing, after which the tenant fled the building, terminated the lease, and sued for $70 million. Yorke-Slader’s client has countersued both the tenant and its Chinese parent company and guarantor for $500 million. Bruce Mellett represented the Province of Alberta in its Reference case on the constitutional validity of the federal Impact Assessment Act also known as Bill C-69.  Alberta's position was that the legislation was beyond Parliament's jurisdiction, as it purported to regulate projects and activities within areas of provincial jurisdiction and could make the ultimate decision over whether such activities would be approved as in the public interest. Alberta was successful before the Alberta Court of Appeal, after which Canada appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada, which dismissed the appeal in October 2023. “Bruce doesn’t get as much press and he doesn’t seek it, but he deserves it,” insists a peer. “You want dogged and rigorous work without the bluster? You go to him.” The firm’s younger members are also gaining traction. Ciara Mackey is one singled out by peers. “She’s in the opinions practice, and if I could have her work on every one of my files, I would. She writes how you think. She is the brains – you know you’re in good hands with her.”

 

ONTARIO
Bennett Jones’ entry into the Toronto market has proven “enormously successful,” with a deep stable of litigators that not only rivals that of its historic Alberta counterpart but also rivals that of many other of its more historically entrenched peers on Bay Street. It is also observed that “Bennett Jones is more specialized than a lot of other firms of its position,” with class actions, securities, intellectual property, competition and even environmental work part of the firm’s overall composition. Dominique Hussey, a celebrated IP-focused partner, has made a swift ascent in profile, becoming the firm’s national managing partner over the past year. “For a woman of her vintage, that is a real milestone,” declares a peer. Primarily recognized and lauded for her class-actions prowess, Cheryl Woodin acted for Travelers Insurance Company of Canada/Dominion of Canada General Insurance Company as defendant in a common issues trial of business interruption insurance claims, brought on behalf of a putative nationwide class of business owners impacted by COVID-19 shutdowns. The June 2023 trial result was a decisive success for the defendants. One peer asserts, “Cheryl primarily does class actions but she also does trials – she’s a trial lawyer!” Another universally revered class action partner, Mike Eizenga, acted for the Canadian Hockey League, the Ontario Hockey League, the Western Hockey League, the Quebec Major Junior Hockey League, and the 60 major junior hockey teams operating within the leagues in a class action alleging abuse and hazing of players since the inception of the leagues in 1965, brought on behalf of a putative nationwide class of former and current major junior hockey players. Jeffrey Leon is an esteemed figure who recently had the distinguished honor of being the president of the American College of Trial Lawyers, only the second Canadian to receive this achievement. Leon was selected to act as co-lead counsel to the Public Order Emergency Commission, which is undertaking public hearings related to the invocation of the Emergencies Act by the Canadian Federal Government in February 2022, in response to the "trucker convoy" protests that assembled on Parliament Hill and throughout downtown Ottawa, Canada and other protests at various locations in Canada. Robert Staley, a securities-based partner with a reputation for a “cowboy” approach to trials, acts for an international hedge fund and its principal in a significant defamation claim concerning serious and false allegations of securities fraud, market manipulation and other illegal conduct.

 

BRITISH COLUMBIA
Bennett Jones is a relatively recent entry into the Vancouver market, which it has taken to with aplomb. “Bennett Jones has made inroads here, they have been very aggressive in their hiring,” ventures one local peer. “They pulled in some good people.” One such hire, David Gruber, is noted for his commercial litigation practice, which has also historically incorporated insolvency aspects, has been viewed by peers as a particularly plum score. Commercial litigator Melanie Teetaert is also cheered as a particularly auspicious hire.

Blake Cassels & Graydon

ONTARIO

Blake Cassels & Graydon’s Toronto office has long been a dominant force in the city’s business community, servicing some of the largest and most recognized names on Bay Street. While it is often linked to financial institutions, the firm has of late exemplified been active in cases that exemplify a more diverse roster of clients. Notably, some of these cases have been spearheaded by younger partners. Iris Fischer, a commercial litigator with a niche in the defamation and media capacities, represented the Toronto Star and one of its reporters in an application to unseal the estate court files of a prominent Canadian philanthropist couple that was murdered. After succeeding for her client at the Ontario Court of Appeal, she triumphed once again at the Supreme Court of Canada in June 2021. Melanie Baird, who joined the firm from Lenczner Slaght along with Andrew Skodyn (with whom she works in tandem with as well as on her own), has also quickly ascended the ranks, and yet is still considered underrated by some. “Blakes in Toronto is first-class,” declares a peer, “and Melanie in particular is a litigation standout. She drives a huge volume of work and is an exceptionally talented trial lawyer in intellectual property cases, class actions and commercial litigation generally. Although well regarded and highly ranked, her profile falls below exceptional contribution she makes to her firm and the litigation bar.” (Benchmark attempted to address this by bestowing the “Intellectual Property Litigator of the Year” award on Baird at the 2022 Benchmark Canada awards – ed.) Skodyn has also amassed his own fan base over the years, with one peer marveling, “It’s been fascinating to watch him blaze trails [at his former firms and his present one]."

QUÉBEC

The firm’s Montréal office scored a key young recruit in Matthew Liben, a noted standout who the firm lured to its bench from Stikeman Elliott. A client raves on Liben’s behalf: “Matthew has done an excellent job in his thoroughness and ability to advocate on behalf of us thus far. I observed several examinations and was impressed by his ability to quickly redirect the questioning and make objections on behalf of our witnesses. His calm demeanor and ability to succinctly analyze the issues in front of many of our senior executives has been very valuable.” Francis Rouleau, litigation group leader in Montréal, continues to represent Bell Canada and its affiliates as lead counsel in injunctive proceedings which called upon Québecor and its affiliates to restore the broadcast signal that Groupe TVA unlawfully interrupted during the Stanley Cup playoffs. Blakes succeeded in having the Court issue an injunctive order enjoining Groupe TVA to restore the broadcast signal to more than 425,000 Bell subscribers. Claude Marseille and future star Ariane Bisaillon scored a big win for Hydro-Québec before the Supreme Court of Canada in 2020, securing a unanimous decision that allowed for the construction of a new transmission line. The Blakes pair was brought in on appeal to the Supreme Court and succeeded in reversing the Court of Appeal’s earlier denial of the client’s right to build on disputed lands across the province of Québec. Simon Seida, who made partner in 2019, attends to a diverse practice, most recently attending to matters with a competition and class action element. Rouleau, Marseille and Robert Torralbo have long been championed as litigation leaders by local peers, and continue to be, with one contemporary taking care to note, “These guys are still at the top of their game, primo litigators without a doubt.”

 

ALBERTA

Blakes’ Calgary office houses one of the community’s deepest litigation benches, all attending to the most high-stakes matters affecting the region’s volatile oil-and-gas industry. Ken Mills, a longtime leader of the litigation group in this office, is credited by several in the community for several successful strategic recruiting, enterprising and culture-fostering decisions. A local peer asserts, “Blakes did phenomenally well during the COVID downturn. They were hiring and growing when others were letting go. They have a good group of young people coming up who just naturally ‘get it.’” David Tupper remains one of Calgary’s most active and in-demand partners. “David is someone I see on a lot of the big infrastructure work.” In one such example, Tupper represented Pembina Pipeline Corporation in a shareholder dispute, in which he triumphed in August 2021. Tupper provided counsel to Nexen Energy ULC arising from a 2015 pipeline spill in Northern Alberta. Dalton McGrath, along with future star Michael O’Brien successfully represented ENMAX Energy Corporation in connection with a CAD $120 million dispute concerning the existence of transmission lines and towers located in downtown Calgary that serve millions of customers against a private landowner. Mark Morrison, one of the only bona fide white-collar crime practitioners in the province, was selected as the Compliance Monitor for SNC-Lavalin for a three-year term as part of its recent conviction and $280 million fine arising from fraud and bribery in Libya.

 

BRITISH COLUMBIA

In Vancouver, peers point to securities star Sean Boyle as “someone who is doing some fairly novel and sophisticated work for BC and at the same time really hustling to get more of it. He has done a great job of getting his own name out there while also building the team.” Alexandra Luchenko is another swiftly risen star who is making waves in the white-collar criminal world. “Alex is a certified fraud examiner,” notes one peer, “and she is coming up huge in the criminal side of things.” Another peer raves, “Alex is awesome. She is smart, super hard-working and has the ability to cut through the morass and get to the nub of it. She’s efficient and doesn’t waste time with petty things.” The pair of Boyle and Luchenko act for Detona Capital in proceedings commenced in January 2019 by the British Columbia Securities Commission and Alberta Securities Commission against over 60 respondents styled as the Bridgemark Group relating to an alleged cheque swamp scheme in excess of $50 million. Blakes, along with other law firms, have filed a Notice of Constitutional Question, alleging illegal search and seizure of the Parties’ bank accounts and challenging the constitutionality of the Freeze Order provisions of the Securities Act. The investigation continues with document discovery and compelled interviews taking place.  Issues surrounding sealing order and the intersection of a class action are working through the court of appeal with applications being made to the Supreme Court of Canada. Joe McArthur is also beloved by many in the community, with one peer going so far as to call him “just my favorite, so easy to deal with” and further opining “We could sure use more in the profession like Joe.” Another asserts, “Joe can do it all, but his sweet spot is arbitrations and in particular those that cross borders. He’s not only a leader in that regard but also kind of cornered a market.” It is also noted that Laura Cundari has a “huge, and growing, arbitration practice that deals with a lot of construction and infrastructure. She is also getting a ton of arbitrator appointments.”

 

Peers also commend Blakes for its class action practice, and in particular, the evident fostering of younger talent attending to these matters. “Younger Blakes lawyers are getting more involved in class actions, and clients welcome it,” testifies a peer. “They want to hire a top-tier firm but they don’t want to necessarily pay the rates of a more senior partner.” Illustrating the firm’s class-action capacity as well as its inter-office prowess, a multi-office team consisting of Toronto’s Catherine Beagan-Flood and Nicole Henderson and Vancouver’s Robin Reinertson represent TDL Group in litigation stemming from a published report regarding location data collected by the Tim Horton’s mobile app. The plaintiffs allege collection and use of geolocation data of consumers without proper disclosure or consent through the Tim Hortons, Burger King and Popeye’s Chicken mobile apps.

Borden Ladner Gervais

ONTARIO

Borden Ladner Gervais’ Ontario presence is fortified by offices in Toronto and Ottawa, both stocked with versatile litigators attending to various specialties. These locations are particularly revered for the diversity of practices, covering health and medical, insurance and public law – areas in which the firm has been particularly dominant – as well as both domestic and international arbitration, construction, commercial litigation and securities.
     The Toronto office elevated its stature in the securities space with a high-profile win for Cormark Securities in a thorny matter in which the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) alleged that Cormark and various other individual and group defendants engaged in illegal distribution of securities, failed to act in good faith and conducted themselves contrary to the public interest regarding certain transactions initiated by the defendants facilitating the 2017 exchange listing of cannabis entity Canopy Growth Corporation. The OSC claimed this series of transactions constituted an illegal distribution of Canopy shares without the required prospectus. Led by securities star David Di Paolo and future star Graham Splawski, the Borden Ladner team argued that the transactions did not constitute an illegal distribution, emphasizing that the restricted shares remained within the regulatory "closed system" and were distinct from the freely-trading shares sold on the market, demonstrating compliance with the law. This argument proved successful when, in November 2024, the Capital Markets Tribunal rejected the OSC’s claim. This landmark win further augmented the already celebrated status of the two lead partners. “Dave Di Paolo is an excellent lawyer, with excellent oral advocacy” declares a peer. “You see him a ton in the securities space, and I’m seeing a lot more of him lately. He’s very strategic. Graham Splawski is also a real up-and-comer, who’s generating a lot more notice.” The Toronto office is also home to one of the firm’s most championed arbitration practitioners, Hugh Meighen. “Hugh has great international chops,” states a peer, who goes on to mention, “He got training at [Magic Circle UK firm] Freshfields in London, and he is a very well respected guy.” Caitlin Sainsbury is another favorite of the Toronto legal community. “We are big fans of Caitlin,” claims one securities-focused peer. “She really knows her way around the competition and the securities spaces, which is rare, especially for someone of her vintage.” Nadia Effendi is also lauded for “fierce dedication to advocacy in the public law space.” Effendi “came up with [celebrated appellate star and Borden Ladner counsel] Guy Pratte and has since taken on her own cases with aplomb.”

QUÉBEC

Borden Ladner Gervais’ Montréal office is home to a team dedicated to work that has been recognized as some of the firm’s key calling cards, such as construction, insurance and labor and employment. The latter practice is particularly deep in Montréal. Justine Laurier is the regional manager for this practice and has been particularly visible as one of its top advocates. Laurier triumphed on behalf of Lightspeed Commerce in May 2024, when the Superior Court of Montréal ruled in the client’s favor in a dispute concerning compensation being sought be a senior executive of the company who allegedly suffered losses in options and equity during his termination period. Karine Chênevert continues to garner acclaim for her practice that balances a diverse array of class-action matters.
     The Montréal office lays claim to a particularly high-profile and multifaceted win in an investor-state arbitral award dispute for shareholders in private India-based entity Devas, who in November 2021, initiated recognition and enforcement proceedings of two such awards mandating the Republic of India to pay over US$110 million before the Superior Court of Quebec. Because of India’s failure to honor the obligations of this award, Devas successfully seized Montréal-based assets valued at US$37.5 million. The case wound its way through a serpentine path of several court proceedings and decisions, before three appeals were heard at the Quebec Court of Appeal in December 2023. A year later, this Court issued a landmark decision in favor of the Devas investors. The case was led by Montréal luminary Mathieu Piché Messier, who remained involved until his judicial appointment in September 2024, after which Montréal future star Karine Fahmy and Toronto’s Ira Nishisato, a commercial litigator with a noted niche in injunctions, asset freezes and other extraordinary remedies, commandeered the proceedings. “If this isn’t the biggest case in Montréal at the moment, it’s certainly in the Top Three,” ventures one local peer, echoing the sentiment of others.

 

ALBERTA
Borden Ladner Gervais’ Calgary office is particularly noted for its construction practice, largely focused on the energy industry. “In construction, we see BLG a lot, particularly on the higher-end arbitrations,” notes a peer. The construction group is led by Patricia “Trish” Morrison, who took the baton from Calgary construction luminary Jeff Vallis, who has since retired. Peers also note, “In class actions, Loni da Costasteps in and has done a fantastic job there.”

     The firm acts for ITP, a pipe-in-pipe technology company based in France. The plaintiff, CNOOC Petroleum North America, filed a Statement of Claim against a number of parties including ITP alleging breach of contract and negligence related to a pipeline failure in Northern Alberta. The pipeline failure resulted in approximately five million liters of bitumen being released into the environment. The value of this matter is over C$700 million. Andrew Pozzobon provides the trial lead, while Peter Banks leads in the appellate capacity.

 

BRITISH COLUMBIA

Borden Ladner Gervais’ Vancouver office is home to litigators in various capacities, but is particularly noted for those attending to arbitration, environmental and land-use, construction and class-action cases. “It’s especially remarkable how much international arbitration work they do,” observes one direct peer. “Robert Deane particularly – he’s all over the place. He’s such great counsel that so many clients want him involved, so he is actually doing more than just arbitration these days, getting pulled in all kinds of directions, but he seems to be able to handle it all. Craig Chiasson is [BLG’s] primary arbitration counsel now. Craig is also sitting as an arbitrator – and getting more appointments than I am getting now, which is annoying!”
     In one such example of Deane’s ever-broadening spectrum of work, he and Michelle Maniago work on a constitutional rights-focused suit concerning the family of a Vancouver woman who was forced to transfer hospitals before she could receive medical assistance in dying, a case that also exemplifies Maniago’s versatility; Maniago is most often recognized for her class-action work. “[Seasoned Vancouver class-action counsel] Brad Dixon is still there and still doing great, but Michelle is really stepping it up and appearing on a lot more lead roles,” notes a peer. Sarah McEachern is also cheered for “really building up her [construction, commercial and arbitration] practice over there and doing quite nicely.”

 

Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg


Through its offices in Toronto and Montréal, Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg maintains a dominant position in the eastern half of Canada, with a litigation bench distributed evenly among both offices that is composed of a healthy generational spread of seasoned partners and up-and-comers, all imbued with a hard-charging approach to litigation. Peers regularly reference the firm as being one of the strongest and most balanced in terms of litigation horsepower at a firm that is not exclusively dedicated to litigation. “Davies remains one of the most consistently strong group of litigators. They’re always at the very front of the pack.” Clients meanwhile turn out in force to voice their appreciation for the firm. One cheers the Davies team as “incredibly responsive, with a very quick and thorough grasp of the issues to resolve” and specifically addresses the “excellent and rigorous legal analysis and attention to detail.” Another client notes, “The representations prepared [for us] addressed the issues in depth, and they were delivered within the agreed deadline and mostly on budget.” Still another offers in summation, “I have worked with almost all of the leading Canadian dispute resolution firms. Davies is in the highest grouping.”

In the Toronto office, all-purpose trial lawyer Kent Thomson is a towering figure. Respected as a tireless, dogged worker and a dynamic courtroom presence, Thomson has the support from both peers and clients. Thomson, along with Derek Ricci, is acting for TransAlta Corporation in defending an oppression action brought by a minority shareholder. This $750 million dispute was commenced after a Davies team successfully defended TransAlta in connection with “public interest” proceedings initiated against TransAlta by Mangrove Partners before the Ontario Securities Commission and Alberta Securities Commission. Michael Lubetsky is also part of this team and is a debut future star who is generating a notable groundswell of peer and client review on his own. “Michael Lubetsky was spectacularly diligent and thorough, particularly given the pro bono nature of the mandate [he led for us],” testifies one client. “He and the Davies team left no stone unturned and presented well-researched and creative arguments to the court.” Lubetsky is also working with Andrea Burke and Sandra Forbes in acting for McKesson in a proposed class action brought by the Province of British Columbia on behalf of all Canadian provincial governments, as well as the Federal government, against manufacturers and distributors of opioids seeking to recover health care costs related to the opioid crisis. Ricci meanwhile is also acting for Giant Tiger in the defense of numerous class proceedings commenced in jurisdictions across Canada relating to alleged price-fixing of commercial bread products in Canada at the wholesale and retail levels. Acting with Ricci is Chantelle Cseh, a swiftly risen former future star who is making her impactful presence felt in the market. “Chantelle Cseh is the pride of Barrie [Ontario],” enthuses one peer. “She is someone I’ve done a boatload of work with and she’s an absolute pleasure to do business with, an extraordinary lawyer.” Cseh is acting as counsel for the appellants, the Estate Trustees of Barry and Honey Sherman, in the high-profile appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada against the Toronto Star and its Chief Investigative Reporter in a matter concerning a sealing order obtained by the Estate Trustees which restricts public access to materials filed in connection with the administration of the Shermans’ estates. Cseh and Matthew Milne-Smith acted for the Canadian Chamber of Commerce as an intervener before the Supreme Court of Canada in an appeal concerning the applicability of arbitration clauses to class actions on Ontario. The plaintiff is an Uber driver who asserts that he is an employee entitled to the protections of the Employment Standards Act. However, at the time that he signed up to be an Uber driver, he entered into an agreement that stated that he was an independent contractor and not an employee, and that any disputes relating to the agreement were to be resolved by way of arbitration. The Supreme Court found that Uber’s Canadian arbitration clauses were unconscionable and invalid. The client intervened in the appeal to assert the importance of holding parties to their commercial bargains.

The Montréal team has been equally busy with its own unique mix of cases across several disciplines. The insolvency group has seen a particularly pronounced level of activity this year. “Davies has had a huge run lately in acting for debtor companies,” attests a peer. “Just taking a look at the numbers for this year it has been them [leading these matters] very often. Particularly out of Montréal because a ton of the retail filings this year have been there.” Denis Ferland is acting as counsel for The Pallinghurst Group, a global metals and mining industry investor, in its proposed equity investment of up to $600 million in Nemaska Lithium to help fund Nemaska’s Whabouchi project in Québec. The transactions involve the first reverse vesting order approved by a Canadian court in the face of active opposition from certain creditors. Leon Moubayed, a “young but very experienced” partner with a white-collar crime specialty, successfully acted for a franchisee in his defense to a prosecution regarding tax-related charges. This prosecution was a test case in a major investigation of computer products franchisees led by the Québec Revenue Agency and the Sûreté du Québec,the provincial police. Moubayed successfully challenged the disclosure of the evidence by the public prosecutors, obtaining a precedent-setting decision in December 2019, and also successfully argued and obtained a judgment from the Court of Québec concluding that the prosecution infringed the client’s right to be tried within a reasonable time and, as a result, ordered a stay of proceedings and charges. Nick Rodrigo, a class-action authority, is acting for US-based Epic Games and its Canadian subsidiary in relation to a proposed class action by users of the popular video game Fortnite. In a class action that is the first of its kind in Canada, the plaintiffs allege that Epic Games intentionally designed Fortnite to be psychologically addictive, leading to uncontrollable and compulsive behavior in players of the game. In addition, the plaintiff complains that the system of in-game purchases is designed to exploit this addiction and represents a form of illegal advertising to children prohibited under the Québec Consumer Protection Act. Guy du Pont, a seasoned trial lawyer and universally revered figure in the Montréal legal community, continues to pursue his agenda of pursuing cases with a tax element.

Fasken

BRITISH COLUMBIA

The Vancouver office of Fasken is widely viewed by peers as home to one of the strongest litigation teams in the city, and indeed one within a big national firm rather than a litigation boutique. “We regularly see someone from Fasken on files, you would have to work pretty hard not to,” confirms one peer. Sadly, the firm had to weather the loss of Mark Andrews, a senior litigation partner of considerable stature, whose unfortunate passing was felt by all in the Vancouver legal community. Even a loss this major, however, did not come as a devastating blow to the team’s collective strength. “Fasken has some of the broadest litigation reach in town,” confirms one local peer. “They have a really deep pool, with talent all across the generations.” Indeed, Geoff Cowper remains a formidable senior figure, with a practice that spans major arbitrations as well as trials. On the younger end of the spectrum, Gavin Cameron led a team representing DP World Prince Rupert in a Fisheries Act prosecution in relation to a port expansion project in Prince Rupert. The Crown laid 10 charges against the defendants, primarily for alleged breaches of conditions under the Fisheries Act Authorization obtained for the Project. Cameron is recognized by peers as “one of the best guys of our vintage in town,” with one confirming, “He would be on every shortlist. [He is as] Smart as they come but doesn’t mind rolling around in the ditch to get something done.” Tracey Cohen, a commercial litigator with a diverse practice, is touted as “one of the most quickly escalating presences in the province,” with one peer noting, “Tracey has a flair for making a client feel very cared for and protected, and if you’re against her, she can be ferocious and tough as nails.” Another competitor calls Cohen “a real leader in the business these days. She has really worked her way to the top.” Cohen represents Eastern Platinum Limited and its subsidiaries in an action commenced by them in the British Columbia Supreme Court against the former officers and directors of the companies as a result of questionable payments pursuant to a change of control of the board that occurred in 2016. Andrew Nathanson also continues to draw praise from the Vancouver legal community on a near-unanimous basis for a multi-faceted practice that blends elements of commercial litigation and white-collar crime.

ONTARIO

Fasken’s Toronto office is host to an equally diverse range of litigation practices, with class actions taking an undeniably central position. In this capacity, Steven Rosenhek has developed a niche practice of his own, with several class actions for automotive entities. Rosenhek is representing Kia Canada and its parent and affiliates in the context of a class action/motion for authorization to institute a class action in Ontario and Québec on behalf of a class of consumers who own or lease Kia models equipped with a panoramic sunroof based on allegations of design and manufacturing defects. Sarah Armstrong leads a team that represents Capital One in three separate CAD$20 million individual claims arising out of a data breach which was publicly disclosed by Capital One in July 2019. Vera Toppings is also making her mark in the class actions world but also beyond this practice. “Fasken has had an uptick on the more sophisticated side of financial work, with David Hausman and Vera Toppings showing up more,” confirms a peer. The firm’s Ontario footprint also extends to Ottawa, where Peter Mantas juggles a bucket of work that touches on administrative law, appeals and white-collar crime work.

QUÉBEC

Fasken’s Montréal office had to weather the recent loss of product liability figurehead Martin Sheehan to the bench, but it has quickly moved to make the strategic hire of Sebastien Richemont from his former post at litigation powerhouse Woods. Richemont is representing XTL Transport, a family business, and its founder against a claim for an oppression remedy and damages for an aggregate amount in excess of $71 million instituted by the daughter of XTL’s founder. Frédéric Gilbert is a commercial litigator who has developed a noteworthy niche in franchise law. He represented the franchise Modern Cleaning Concepts at the Supreme Court of Canada in such a dispute, seeking to reverse an earlier unfavorable decision at the Québec Court of Appeal. “Frédéric is emblematic of the future of commercial litigators,” asserts one peer. Peers are also quick to point out “Noah Boudreau is doing a lot of the heavy lifting over there these days. You’re seeing a lot more of him and he deserves more notice. He took over a good part of Martin Sheehan’s practice.” Alain Reindeau leads a team that successfully represented Transat, a Canadian airline and tourism public company, in the heavily disputed battle for the sale of the company. Eric Simard is part of a team acting for Areva Est Canada and Orano Mining in an action to annul two agreements of a value of more than C$50 million with respect to the sale of shares of a uranium entity following the discovery that one of Orano’s employees involved in the negotiation of the agreements illegally received a substantial amount of over C$17 million.

ALBERTA

The Calgary office, while smaller than the others, is in growth mode. The recent hire of Darren Reed, a commercial lawyer formerly with Blake Cassels & Graydon and JSS Barristers before that, is cheered by peers as “a fantastic recruit. Darren has that great combination of young energy and years of experience being seasoned at two other great litigation shops.” Peers also advise, “Pay more attention to Karen Wyke, she is a fierce litigator doing some big cases that people are sort of watching at the moment. She is doing a giant arbitration for an Italian client.” Gulu Punia and Arif Chowdhury represent Mac’s Convenience Stores in a lawsuit whereby the plaintiff seeks over CAD$24 million in damages on the basis of a disputed right of first refusal clause in an ATM services agreement.

Lawson Lundell

BRITISH COLUMBIA

Lawson Lundell’s BC operations span offices in Vancouver and two locations in Kelowna. The Vancouver office houses one of the city’s largest and most comprehensive litigation benches, composed of lawyers attending to a diverse array of practices encompassing several specialties – particularly, aboriginal law, energy and resource law, and labor and employment – in which the firm has long held dominant positions. “Lawson still is and always has been a significant player in this market,” asserts a peer, who goes on to note, “With all of the changes and movement happening in Vancouver at the moment, Lawson just seems to be one firm that doesn’t get affected. They tend to keep everyone happy and busy. And they are growing! They are beefing up their commercial litigation group, whereas a lot of other firms around here are not.” Another insists, “Lawson is very strong, and they appear to be making smart moves in the market. They brought in Scott Boucher, who does insolvency.” Boucher, a future star in this edition, is also known for commercial and trust and estates work.
     Keith Bergner elicits unwavering peer support as an authority in the aboriginal law community. “He’s really good in this space,” insists a peer. “He knows how to treat people, and he knows the law.” Among several appointments, Bergner was retained as lead counsel by the Government of British Columbia to defend an aboriginal title claim brought by the Cowichan Nation regarding private lands held in fee simple title, arising from various Crown grants issued over 100 years ago, land which is currently home to residential and commercial developments. “I’m against Keith right now,” testifies a Toronto-based peer, “and he is a gentleman. He’s from Manitoba, I’m from Saskatchewan. So, there’s common ground there – we’re Prairie boys! That’s not to say we’re giving each other any quarter – it’s a huge fucking dust-up.” Another frequent opponent confirms this: “Keith is a very upstanding guy. We’re often against each other but we’re collegial and go for a drink when we reach a resolution.” Will Roberts and Laura Bevan acted for the BC Securities Commission regarding an alleged “pump-and-dump” market-manipulation scheme, for which the masterminds were ordered to pay disgorgement orders and administrative penalties totaling $19 million to the Commission, before which they declared bankruptcy. The Lawson pair successfully applied for an order that the Commission’s orders against the masterminds survive their eventual discharge from bankruptcy. An appeal at the Supreme Court of Canada was heard in December 2023, and a decision was issued in July 2024. The SCC held that the Commission’s disgorgement orders survived discharge from bankruptcy. Bevan also acts with all-purpose trial luminary Craig Ferris for the Law Society of British Columbia, which challenges the constitutionality of the new Legal Professions Act in BC, which when brought into force will eliminate the Law Society and replace it with a new single legal regulator. The Law Society claims that the features of the new Act undermine the independence of the bar, which should be recognized as an unwritten constitutional principle in Canada and therefore undermines all constitutional rights. Ferris also works with Marko Vesely act on behalf of Canada on a national class action proceeding brought on behalf of Métis and non-status Indians. The plaintiff class claims that Canada breached its duty of care and fiduciary duty to protect them from losing their aboriginal identity when they were apprehended and put into care with non-aboriginal adoptive parents during the period of 1951-1991. “I’ve worked with and against Marko, and it’s been a pleasure either way,” commends a peer.

 

ALBERTA

Lawson Lundell’s Calgary location is newer and smaller than it’s Vancouver flagship, although not by much, and has earned the reverence of peers and clients alike. “They provided advice regarding a longstanding conflict among joint-venture participants, including representation in an arbitration process and advice regarding settlement negotiations, which are currently ongoing,” confirms one client. “They support a dual track approach, supporting the litigation track planning and the negotiation track planning in a collaborative fashion. I am very happy with their service and their people.” The team in this office was recently amplified by a group that decamped from a provincial firm and have acted with aplomb on establishing Lawson as a meaningful market presence on the strength of some key institutional relationships. “That group quickly entrenched itself in this city and came into their own,” observes a peer. Chief among these is Mike Donaldson, who “has really done well with managing that important TransAlta work.” Among several other mandates, Donaldson acts for this client on an action concerning an agreement with the Province of Alberta, dating to the 1960s, for the development of a hydroelectric dam, pursuant to which the Province promised to not grant mineral rights in or adjacent to the dam lands except on such terms that will not restrict or in any way interfere with the dam’s operation or safety. The litigation, valued at roughly $350 million, was brought by TransAlta against the Province in 2022 after the Province failed to prevent third-party producers from pursuing hydraulic fracking activity as part of their mineral exploration, in violation of the agreement. The matter was moved to mediation. Shannon Hayes also worked with Donaldson on this matter, and this pair also worked with Grant Vogeli in acting for Remington Development in the appellate stage of its continued litigation with Canadian Pacific Railway, who, it was determined via the ruling of a trial, had breached its contract to sell a parcel of downtown development land to Remington and sold the land to the Province of Alberta instead. The court awarded Remington $163 million, a decision that Canadian Pacific appealed. The argument was heard in September 2024. Vogeli is noted by peers to be “one of the only partners at Lawson and, and also in all of Calgary, do be doing work not related to oil and gas.” Shannon Wray and Shailaz Dhalla act for TransAlta in another matter concerning the client’s entitlement to its proportionate decommissioning costs on two properties pursuant to the Power Purchase Arrangements Regulation. The client seeks to recover $75 million by way of a final order from the Alberta Utilities Commission for forecasted decommissioning costs. Wray is championed by one client as “an absolute pleasure to work with and well informed about the business and the law.” Another asserts, “Shannon provides excellent advice, knowledgeable and timely responses, and advice that takes business considerations into account.” Marika Strobl is also a favorite among clients. One testifies, “She cares, and she engages fully with us in what is a very messy situation.” Two younger stars, Alexis Teasdale and Jonathan Selnes, are also developing a strong local following. One contemporary quips, “If you’ll pardon my language, Alexis and Jon work their asses off and are so good. They must be recognized more!” Teasdale is noted for a burgeoning insolvency niche, and Selnes’ practice encompasses commercial, construction, estates, insurance and class actions.

 

ALBERTA

Lawson Lundell’s Calgary location is newer and smaller than it’s Vancouver flagship, although not by much. The team in this office was recently amplified by a group that decamped from a provincial firm and have acted with aplomb on establishing Lawson as a meaningful market presence on the strength of some key institutional relationships. “That group quickly entrenched itself in this city and came into their own,” observes a peer. Chief among these is Mike Donaldson, who “has really done well with managing that important TransAlta work.” Among several other mandates, Donaldson represents this client in an administrative law case concerning an agreement with the Province of Alberta in 2016 in which it agreed to shut down its coal plants before their end of life in exchange for $40 million in transition payments. The Province then passed a property tax regulation that prohibits anyone who is a party to such an agreement from claiming certain types of depreciation deductions. TransAlta challenged the regulation as discriminatory and unlawful. Shannon Wray and Shailaz Dhalla act for TransAlta in another matter concerning the client’s entitlement to its proportionate decommissioning costs on two properties pursuant to the Power Purchase Arrangements Regulation. The client seeks to recover $75million by way of a final order from the Alberta Utilities Commission for forecasted decommissioning costs. Wray is championed by one client as “an absolute pleasure to work with and well informed about the business and the law.” Another asserts, “Shannon provides excellent advice, knowledgeable and timely responses, and advice that takes business considerations into account.” Shannon Hayes is also a client favorite. “She is extremely knowledgeable about litigation processes in Alberta and always provides practical advice and risk assessments. She always keeps us informed of progress and provides options for steps to take in litigation.” Two younger stars, Alexis Teasdale and Jonathan Selnes, are also developing a strong local following. One contemporary quips, “If you’ll pardon my language, Alexis and Jon work their asses off and are so good. They must be recognized more!”

McCarthy Tétrault



Miller Thomson

ONTARIO
Miller Thomson stands out in Ontario for the diversity of its bench, its clients and its work, which spans a greater variety than that of many other firms, particularly those that are Toronto-centric. “Miller Thomson has an unusual model,” observes a local peer. “They are one of the biggest firms in Canada and cover almost every province. They have grown aggressively but have done so in a smart way. They do work that other firms don’t do, like insurance defense and family law.” The firm’s culture is such that “each of Miller Thomson offices has its own local feel, as opposed to other national firms that have a very Toronto-centric culture, but there is a good synergy between offices.” Another peer notes, “Their [Toronto] commercial litigation team is quite deep, something like 15 partners, a lot of whom didn’t grow up in big firms. They’ll be on everything from public company disputes, mid- to high-end shareholder disputes. They actually do more trial work than more ‘Bay Street’-centric firms because they do work for more mid-tier entrepreneurial entities who have done well and so by nature are more litigious. They have toughed it out, they’re not going to be pushed around and get screwed. They are willing to fight over principles.” The firm is one of the few national entities whose strategic expansion has focused on developing bench strength in areas of Ontario such as London and the Waterloo Region, to the point where its concentration of litigators there is as dense as it is in Toronto. Miller Thomson is also noted for being one of the few national full-service players with a high concentration of lawyers dedicated to environmental work as well as (management-side) labor and employment.

     Adam Stephens is namechecked by a peer as a “very good and able lawyer, particularly in shareholders’ rights cases.” Stephens also acts as the chair of the firm’s litigation group nationally. Eric Sherkin, cheered by a client as “smart, reliable and intuitive” represents a non-profit organization created in the memory of the victims of Ukraine International Airlines Flight PS752, which was shot down by the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard after taking off from Tehran on its way to Kiev, killing all 176 people on board, in an oppression-remedy claim brought by a member of this organization who took issue with certain decisions of the Board and sought certain documentary disclosure above and beyond what the association’s bylaw and the relevant legislation stipulates. The application, which was heard in November 2024, was dismissed just a few weeks later. Bobby Sachdeva, co-lead of the commercial litigation group, is championed by a peer for his “appropriate aggressiveness tempered by manners. There are so many proverbial assholes out there – no thank you! Give me someone more like Bobby Sachdeva to work with.”  Peers also identify James Zibarras, with one noting,In the fraud world, he might fly under the radar because frankly I don’t think he really seeks the fame and recognition, but he certainly knows a lot about the world of Mareva injunctions and fraud.” Nafisah Chowdhury and Lisa Goodfellow both represent the firm’s Toronto-based labor and employment group, acting for a range of entities in workplace- and human resource-related disputes. Operating from the Waterloo office, Rohit Kumar is said to be “doing a lot of Waterloo-centric work but is also Miller Thomson’s OSC specialist.”

 

QUEBEC
Like its Ontario counterparts, Miller Thomson’s Montréal office is recognized for a broad range of litigation practices, several of which it is said to have “cornered a market” on. Fadi Amine, managing partner of this office and is a celebrated class-actions based partner, generates considerable acclaim. A peer confirms, “Fadi is on the opioids class actions. He's great!” Adina Georgescu is the head of the administrative law group and is active in expropriation, environmental and energy matters. “She has major class actions in environmental law,” confirms a peer. “She’s in a nuisance lawsuit in Brossard on the South Shore.” Stephane Trihey, a commercial litigation generalist, acts on a matter concerning the annulment of a will of Dickie Moore, the late Canadian hockey player who was also ran a successful construction equipment leasing business. Trihey represents the trustee and liquidator of Moore’s estate. Claudia Desjardins Bélisleis part of the Montréal office’s labor and employment group, a group that is said to “actually go[es] to court more often than many litigators! They act in front of many civil courts but also many administrative tribunals.” Yves Robillard, an all-purpose commercial litigator whose practice emphasizes shareholder’s disputes, is another community favorite. “He’s doing quite well on a case I have with him right now,” testifies a peer, who then concedes humorously, “OK, he’s kicking my ass, if I’m being honest.”

 

BRITISH COLUMBIA
Miller Thomson’s Vancouver litigation group, with an approximate headcount of 36, is helmed by Sarah Hansen, who attends to environmental and indigenous law. “Sarah is great,” claims a peer, “and Miller Thomson actually has a long history of this practice. One of the best indigenous-focused firms in town [JFK] actually got its start at Miller!” Hansen leads a team that is negotiating with a First Nations tribe to build out a ski resort. Kelsey Sherriff is dedicated to class actions, and Ashley Mitchell represents the firm’s Vancouver labor and employment practice, acting on behalf of management in workplace disputes. Cobi Dayan, who makes a debut as a future star in this edition, attends to a wide range of disputes in the construction area, which often cross borders and are more prone to end up at trial.

 

Osler Hoskin & Harcourt


ONTARIO

Osler’s Toronto office is its center of corporate activity and its litigators are a hit with clients. One commends the firm’s “team approach; appropriate billing rate for task; appreciation of balance between legal and business risk; user friendly client service, and gender diversity.” Another asserts, “Osler’s team is superior to others in their written and oral advocacy, practical advice, and client service. [They are] Very methodical, detailed and strategic. [They provide] Excellent briefs, well-structured and articulate advocacy.” Larry Lowenstein, a seasoned commercial litigator and perennial favorite with peers and clients, represents the Bank of Montréal in class-action lawsuits commenced in five provinces alleging that Canada’s major banks, including the client, and two credit card companies conspired to fix the credit card fees charged to merchants. The Ontario action alone is valued at approximately $5 billion. Another championed partner, Laura Fric is defending BP in a securities class action arising from the Deepwater Horizon explosion. The plaintiff alleges the defendant made misrepresentations to Canadian investors prior to, and following, the explosion. “Laura has really come up over the years and deserves more notice,” insists a peer. “Right now, when I think of Osler’s class-action practice, she is the first name that comes to mind.” Adam Hirsh makes his debut as a future star in this edition of Benchmark Canada on the strength of his wide-ranging commercial practice that encompasses a host of specialties, including tax litigation, an area for which Osler is known to hold the premier position among other Bay Street firms. Hirsh has already dazzled several clients; one notes, “Adam was the engagement partner on our matter and was outstanding both in terms of his legal skills and his attention to detail in practical, business, and finance matters. He demonstrated patience, thoroughness, and determination in all aspects of his work.” Another goes as far as to assert, “Adam is an outstanding lawyer in that he not only knows the law, but also takes the time to understand all practical business and client issues. I’ve practiced for 38 years and there are few lawyers I’ve seen that have his complete skill set.”


QUÉBEC

Osler’s Montréal office has been notably in growth mode as of late. “Osler is coming back! They are building back up here in litigation with some smart hires,” observes a peer. The firm made a key strategic recruit to its Montréal office recently when it brought on Stéphane Eljarrat, a white-collar practitioner formerly with Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg. Peers are united in their view that the recruit was a substantial one. “Stéphane is one of the few people in Montréal doing that kind of work at that level,” declares one peer. “In a typical year, he’d be off in India or Brazil.” Clients agree; One testifies, “Stéphane always provides sound advice, caters to the business needs and takes into account our reality. He provides prompt feedback and precise answers and just overall gives great service. He knows our business reality perfectly and is interested in it; he even participated in targeted training sessions for our internal clients.” More recently, the firm lured Celine Legendre to its bench from McCarthy Tétrault, an auspicious augmentation in the eyes of peers. “Her client contacts are phenomenal, and people love working with her,” opines one competitor. Legendre’s addition adds depth to a class-action practice previously chaired by Eric Prefontaine, himself a revered class action practitioner in the province and beyond. A peer raves, “Eric is actually called to the Paris bar! He’s just phenomenal.” Prefontaine represents Loop Industries in a national class action that was filed in October 2020 following the publication of a short-seller report, which alleges several issues with Loop’s technology, business model, and organization. The plaintiff alleges that Loop has therefore made misrepresentations to its investors and is responsible for the damages resulting from the decline in Loop’s stock price that followed the publication of the report at issue. Future star Alexandre Fallon is quickly gaining a devoted following. One competitor notes, “Alex is young but he’s asserting himself – he is taking the lead on some of the opioid litigation.” A highly appreciative client extols, “Alexandre is one of the most intelligent and brilliant persons I have dealt with. He is, by far, the best litigator in the Province of Québec.”


ALBERTA

Osler’s Calgary office is composed of a team that, while smaller than that of the eastern provinces, possesses “significant experience in issues related to building mega projects extending across various jurisdictions, especially, in the oil-and-gas mid-stream transportation industry,” according to a client. A peer confirms, “Oslers has become a very big player in the Alberta market.” Colin Feasby represents Alliance Canada Marketing and its various parent entities in the defense of a US $100 million claim brought by BP Canada seeking damages for breach of a contract for the shipping of gas on the Alliance Pipeline, which was slapped with a new tariff structure by the Canada Energy Regulator that allegedly adversely affected the fulfillment of the contract. Maureen Killoran is heralded for a “profile and presence in the market that is spectacular,” according to one peer, who elaborates, “She is more in demand than she has time for. She is getting called every day for the most challenging pipeline work in the province.” Killoran is spending an increasing amount of time in Vancouver, building out a burgeoning outpost for the firm in that city to attend to more of the cross-province pipeline work, but she is still viewed as one of Calgary’s most prominent energy players. She represents Canadian Natural Resources in issues involving contractual and account-billing practices relating to a processing and upgrader facility. Killoran and Melanie Gaston represent Williams Group and some related entities in a cross-border matter valued at $500 million regarding issues relating to a facility construction/purchase-and-sale agreement. On her own, Gaston represents the Town of Canmore regarding issues relating to development and municipal bylaw enforceability in the Town relating to various land-use restrictions.

Singleton Urquhart Reynolds Vogel


ONTARIO
Founded as a construction boutique firm in 1982, Vancouver-based Singleton Urquhart amended its name and firmly established a second office in Toronto when it attracted Toronto construction luminariesBruce Reynolds and Sharon Vogel (who is now the Toronto-based co-Managing Partner) to its bench several years ago. The combined unit continues to gain traction and win the acclaim from clients in both markets. “Singleton is known for construction, but they also seem to be diversifying,” observes a peer. Another confirms, “They are in some of the biggest infrastructure disputes in the [Greater Toronto Area], with some local household names in the industry as clients.”
     Reynolds has cultivated a celebrated reputation as counsel in the construction- and coverage-related litigation and arbitration spaces, as well as an in-demand neutral arbitrator. Reynolds represents Aviva Insurance Company of Canada in a mandate concerning the receivership of “The One” mixed-used condominium skyscraper at the intersection of Bloor and Yonge Streets in Downtown Toronto. The high-profile development, which was planned to accommodate luxury retailers, hotels, and residential units, has been bedeviled by uncertainty due to cost overruns and other variables. Reynolds was retained to provide strategic advice as well as representation in insolvency proceedings particularly with respect to navigating Aviva’s potential exposure in respect of its obligations as insurer of the deposits of persons having purchased residential units in the building. Vogel has been retained by Cherubini Metal Works to provide ongoing advice regarding Cherubini’s claim for unpaid invoices and lien claim (valued at approximately $CAD9 million) with regards to Cherubini’s fabrication, delivery and installation of three bespoke bridges for the Waterfront Toronto project. The name partners are far from the only star players in the Toronto office; two younger members of the team, Jesse Gardner and James Little, appear alongside Reynolds and/or Vogel in most of the firm’s highest-stakes mandates. “I’m actually starting to see more of each of them,” declares one Toronto peer in the infrastructure field on Gardner’s and Little’s behalf. “They learned from the best and are now running with it. They do a lot of their own business development and take active roles on these files, which has really paid off for them.”

 
BRITISH COLUMBIA
The team in Singleton Reynolds’ Vancouver office has, similarly to its Toronto twin, maintained an unwavering commitment to construction and surety industries. This office distinguished itself by having developed a notable depth and diversity of practice that at this point rivals or perhaps even surpasses that of its Toronto office.
The practice breadth is exemplified by David Edinger, now the Western Canada-based co-Managing Partner. Edinger is handling a case in which the plaintiff is a limited partner in an entity developing a concrete residential development in Port Moody, British Columbia. The project, which remains pre-construction, is estimated to have total land and development costs exceeding $CAD150 million. The plaintiff claims that Edinger’s clients, general partners in the project, have engaged in self-dealing, have negligently mismanaged the limited partnership's capital, failed to sell the project when they should have, failed to honor an extraordinary resolution removing them as the general partner and have caused loss and damage to the plaintiff. Robert Moore is cheered by a client as being “well versed in construction litigation” and “understanding the issues associated with our matters.” Moore and Clive Boulton provide the defense in a matter in which the plaintiff was involved in a rear-end accident and alleged that she had suffered a concussion in the accident which resulted in significant ongoing symptoms and demanded an amount beyond policy limits. The court found that the plaintiff did not in fact suffer a concussion and that her symptoms were largely an aggravation of pre-existing psychological conditions, and awarded damages well within policy limits. Stephen Berezowskyjcontinues to enjoy a reputation buoyed by peer and client commendations. One client addresses Berezowskyj as a “solution-focused lawyer [who] doesn't litigate just for the sake of litigation and [is] always looking for ways to efficiently resolve matters.”

Smart & Biggar

Canada’s deepest and most renowned intellectual property-based legal entity, Smart & Biggar, has etched itself a dominant position in the country’s IP community, most notably in the capacity as true trial lawyers. One peer notes, “More often than not, these cases actually go to court! And Smart & Biggar has a pretty stellar record of winning at trial.” Another sums up the firm’s ethos with the declaration, “There are IP lawyers and there are IP litigators. Smart definitely qualifies for the latter designation.” 
     The firm is revered for its range of experience covering patents, trademarks and copyrights, each being areas in which the firm has secured some landmark wins. Its celebrated patent practice leans heavily on the pharmaceutical industry, but is far from limited to this area, with a diverse portfolio of patent victories concerning everything from polymers to hockey helmets. One peer confirms, “I’m actually on a case against them right concerning waterslides! They are litigating this hard.” Its trademark practice, meanwhile, has attracted a list of clients that reads like a “Who’s who” of household names. Historically boasting its deepest bench in Ontario, with practitioners of equal horsepower in its offices in Toronto and Ottawa, the firm has recently provided a substantial boost to its Montréal office, which has grown to nearly double the size of just a few years ago. The firm has also made a noted push into the Alberta market, luring one of Calgary’s only IP practitioners, Evan Nuttall, to its bench. Nuttall brings a unique focus on patents in the oil and gas market, although his practice is not limited to this area.
    
In one of the most substantial and hard-fought pieces of non-pharmaceutical-related patent litigation in Canada as of late, a firm team based in its Ottawa office scored a milestone victory for Dow Chemicals in November 2022 when the Supreme Court of Canada affirmed the record-setting $645 million patent infringement award in the client’s case against Nova. This triumph, which includes is purported to be reported to be the largest Canadian patent award in history, finally puts this hotly contested and long-running sage to an end. Steve Garland, Jeremy Want and Daniel Davies compose the Smart team behind this matter. Garland and Davies also defend AlumaSafway in trademark litigation involving five asserted marks. This litigation also involves claims and counterclaims under contract, competition law, restrictive covenants, breach of confidence, defamation, and interference with contractual relations. Garland, Davies and Toronto’s Mark Biernacki act for the plaintiff in litigation involving a patent covering a novel and lithium-ion portable automotive battery jump-starter.

     Smart & Biggar’s Montréal office has been logging some exceptionally noteworthy wins as well. François Guay, long a luminary in the Québec IP community, has been at the forefront of some particularly controversial and cutting-edge copyright issues concerning the media and broadcasting industry. Guay represented members of the Motion Picture Association of America, Bell Media, Amazon and Netflix in an interim and interlocutory injunction matter and show-cause contempt proceedings against the operators of the Beast IPTV service, an unauthorized online subscription service that provided access to a vast amount of illegal television content. Guay and Jean-Sébastien Dupont also represented Videotron, laying claim to a rare summary trial for copyright infringement in the Federal Court addressing a specific provision of the Copyright Act that allows for the retransmission of certain over-the-air stations by authorized broadcasters.

Stikeman Elliott

 

QUÉBEC
Stikeman Elliott saw its genesis in Montréal and continues its reign as one of the city’s premier players in the commercial litigation arena. The general consensus among those in the Montréal community is summed up by one peer’s assertion: “Stikeman is by far [at] the top out of all of the national firms in Montréal, especially in the corporate commercial litigation space.” A client testifies, “They prepared a very complex case, [and it was] against an aggressive and plaintiff that used selective information to distort the truth massively.” The Montréal litigation group, widely considered one of the strongest, deepest and most consistent, is helmed by Éric Mongeau, who is universally beloved by peers and clients. One such client addresses Mongeau as “[someone who is] excellent at diving into the details of the case and leaving no rocks unturned. [He is a] Master at putting together the facts in a compelling and truthful story, and attacking (more like surgically discrediting) the opponent's logic and position.” Mongeau led a major commercial matter for a consortium of conservationist businessmen in a dispute concerning the purchase of a wilderness reserve. Mongeau triumphed on his clients’ behalf in August of 2023. Yves Martineau is another perennial favorite in the Montréal office. While Martineau has long been a leading figure in the class actions space, he has also earned his stripes as a trial lawyer, a status that was further cemented when he was welcomed as a fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers within the past year. “Yes, he mostly does class actions, which rarely go to trial, but Yves cut his teeth doing trials and is still considered one of the top pleaders in Montréal,” summarizes one contemporary. Peers also advise, “Keep an eye on Guillaume Boudreau-Simard. He is the younger foil to Yves in class actions.” Another peer ventures, I worked with Éric Azran on estate litigation work, and he was very involved, so although he is recognized for insurance and securities, he does more than that!” Another peer declares, “I had a very heated debate with Joseph Reynauld in an insolvency dispute and he was very sharp, very strong.” Enthusiasm is also vibrant for Pierre-Paul Daunais. “Oh, this guy is at the top of his game, without a doubt,” extols one peer. “He had a great result in a case for RBI Tim Hortons concerning an alleged privacy breach on their app.”

 

ONTARIO
Of all the national firms on Bay Steet, Stikeman Elliott is also considered one of the strongest for corporate commercial litigation. “[They do] excellent work in a number of areas, in particular with their dispute appeal services as well as their major commercial litigation leadership,” confirms a client. Speaking to the Toronto team’s bench strength, as well as its relative headroom, one peer states, “One of my favorite people is Eliot Kolers, who is still on the young side but actually one of the more senior team members at this point! It’s a great group, and that includes Dan Murdoch and Aaron Kreaden. I love having cases with these people, they are all very capable and decent counsel who don’t constantly throw up silly motions.” Kolers provided Toronto lead on a milestone win for Teck Resources in the $1 billion sale of its interest in an oil sands project in Calgary. The Toronto team is also noted for its command in the competition capacity. “Katherine Kay is a longtime leader who is still in this space all the time,” observes a peer, “but we also see Sinziana Hennig and Danielle Royal more often.” A team composed of Kay, Murdoch and Hennig represented SNC Lavalin in the successful dismissal of the plaintiff’s application for leave to commence and certification of a proposed secondary market securities class action alleging that SNC failed to make timely disclosure of a material change. In 2021 the Ontario Superior Court held that the claim had no prospect of success and certification of the proposed class action should consequently also be denied, and in 2023, the Ontario Court of Appeal released its decision dismissing the plaintiff’s appeal. The plaintiff did not seek leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada.

 

ALBERTA
Stikeman’s Calgary office, while substantially smaller than the firm’s Eastern operations, consists of two partners, Mike Mestinsek and Geoffrey Holub, who both have a dedicated client following. Mestinsek is called “a practical, aggressive, problem solver” by a client, who goes on to confirm, “Mike is exceptionally responsive and has presence. He is appropriately aggressive and mindful of strategy/tactics that will work for the given party and issue. He is great at identifying the right resource to assist.” Another client offers a particularly glowing and fulsome review:, “Mike is a gifted litigator who also excels at the customer service side of the business. Mike learned the complexity of the business and our underlying contracts.  He managed each step of our litigation extremely well and communicated to us in a timely and detailed manner.  Mike effectively managed a difficult counterparty extremely well - both their corporate representative and their lead counsel.  He handled himself with professionalism all the time, even though it might have been challenging to do that at during many stressful times. Mike also did a great job supporting a parallel path of settlement discussions, at the right time, and giving honest views on pros/cons of all facets our case and the possible path of litigation.” Holub is not without his fans as well. “Geoff is very experienced and practical, plus he’s also very courteous, in a way that is not always the case with other litigators I’ve been involved with.” Holub provided Calgary counsel on the aforementioned matter for Teck. The Calgary office is also in growth mode; this year the firm lured Matti Lemmens, a versatile younger litigator with a swiftly rising profile, to its bench from another national firm.

 

BRITISH COLUMBIA
Like its Calgary office, Stikeman’s Vancouver shop is also smaller than the firm’s Eastern segment and is similarly in growth mode. It also receives healthy client review. “They managed all aspects of our litigation in a very detailed and thorough manner, maximizing our chancing for a positive outcome,” offers one client. Long recognized for the presence of David Brown, an all-purpose commercial litigator with a local peer following, the Vancouver office benefited from the addition of younger stars Jonathan Buysen and Angela Crimeni, both of whom boast their own respective commercial litigation portfolios and ascending community and client followings.

 

 

Torys

ONTARIO

The Toronto office of Torys has long held an enviable position as one of Bay Street’s crown jewels. “They have produced a long line of lawyers with reputations for fierce advocacy and they also have an equally long list of blue-chip clients,” testifies one Toronto peer. Another simply sums up the firm’s prestige and approach with, “Torys is just Torys, and they always have been and always will be.” This peer elaborates, “There’s a level of stature just in the brand and the culture that goes a long way.”
     The firm’s roster has historically showcased a level of depth in the “next-generation” ranks, and this year is no exception. Jeremy Opolsky is one example of a partner whose star has fully risen. “Jeremy is s
omeone I was not that familiar with before, but I am now because he did a great job on an international arbitration we had,” testifies a peer. “He presents very well in the appeal context, [he’s] very academic.” Opolsky is acting for KSV Kofman on various matters, including as the court officer in the CCAA proceedings of Bondfield Construction and in its capacity as Receiver and Trustee-in-Bankruptcy of Forma-Con, a subsidiary of Bondfield. The Trustee commenced proceedings against certain former officers of Forma-Con and suppliers of Forma-Con challenging over $11 million in pre-bankruptcy transactions as Transactions at Undervalue, which are part of an alleged scheme involving over $80 million in suspect transactions involving Bondfield and Forma-Con. The former president of FormaCon and Bondfield was at the center of a false-invoicing scheme. After an investigation revealed that over $80 million had been taken from the companies in this manner, the Monitor and KSV brought claims for transfer at undervalue against the former president. KSV Kofman was granted relief in full, a decision which was upheld on appeal. Sarah Whitmore also exemplifies this generational succession of leaders. Whitmore, along with Andrew Gray, is acting as counsel to Mithaq in a C$308 million unsolicited takeover bid to acquire all the outstanding shares of Aimia not already owned by Mithaq. In addition to transaction counsel, Torys represented Mithaq in connection with related shareholder activism in connection with Aimia’s 2023 annual meeting as well as related litigation related to the 2023 annual meeting and takeover bid, including in connection with its application before the Ontario Capital Markets Tribunal to request that a private placement of shares announced by Aimia following commencement of the bid be cease traded as an improper defensive tactic. Litigation was also commenced on the Commercial List of the Ontario Superior Court, with a trial set to commence in January 2024, which was ultimately resolved. Securities star John Fabello, along with Montréal’s Chris Richter, is representing the Bank of America and Merrill Lynch Commodities in proposed class actions in Ontario and Québec alleging conspiracy and market manipulation in the global gold and silver markets. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants named in the matter engaged in anti-competitive conduct in violation of the Competition Act and breached contracts with the proposed class. The Torys pair was successful in defeating the plaintiffs’ motion to add the firm’s clients to the case, however the plaintiffs proceeded to appeal this decision. After argument at Ontario Court of Appeal in April 2023, the majority of the Court ruled in the plaintiffs’ favor overturning the motion decision. All-purpose commercial litigator Linda Plumpton remains a perennial favorite. “She is the embodiment of the versatile trial lawyer,” offers one peer in summation. “She can handle various specialties and yet prowls around the commercial list as much as anyone. And you can certainly bet she knows how to try cases if it comes to that!”


QUÉBEC 

While a smaller and more recently forged operation, Torys’ Montréal office has been swiftly gaining profile, a phenomenon largely credited to Sylvie Rodrigue, who launched Torys in Montréal and now splits her time between the firm’s two offices. “Sylvie is still a leader in class actions,” voices a peer. “She is regarded as a senior litigator and has a reputation where she will take charge.” A client extols, “Sylvie is an excellent client-relationship manager and a great communicator. She always had a response to the opposition, and she did an incredible job representing me.” Rodrigue is representing Laurentian Bank in a proposed securities class action in Québec alleging primary and secondary market misrepresentations by the bank concerning disclosures related to irregularities in its securitization activities, quality-control processes and underwriting procedures. Torys made a substantial augmentation to its Montréal office and its overall class actions capacity with the addition of Anne Merminod, a rising star in the class actions bar who joined the firm from Borden Ladner Gervais in mid-2024. “This is a big deal,” voices one peer, summing up the general consensus. “Anne has become a real force in class actions. She will be there to eventually take over from Sylvie and will be a powerful duo with her in the meantime.” Julie Himo is the group’s specialist on privacy and cyber-security issues. A peer confides, “It’s not necessarily fun to be against Julie – she is a fierce advocate!”