1. China Foreign Economy and Trade Trust Co., Ltd ("FOTIC"), a financial institution of central government-owned enterprises, has actively carried out consumer financial business in response to a call from the State, initiated a collective capital trust plan to issue financial loans to qualified natural persons, and adopted the loan model of "financial institutions+microloan companies" in its business development. After the overdue of the end drawer, the foreign trade trust prosecutes the end drawer to the court. However, the financial loan assistance business failed to be fully perceived in the first case procedure, due to which there was a bad judgment idea and guidance to avoid the formation of mass cases and the process of drawing conclusions.
2. The investor subscribed, for the special fund for infrastructure construction of HuaJian No.1, which serves as manager of Beijing Huajian Rongxin Asset Management Co., Ltd. and Guosen Securities Co., Ltd. In the follow-up process of fund contract performance, 13 investors initiated arbitration on Beijing Huajian Rongxin Asset Management Co., Ltd. and demanded that Guosen Securities should bear joint and several liquidations due to its overdue failure to pay the fund shares and pay the income. After the arbitration result was that Guosen Securities shared 3% of the complementary liability, each investor filed an application with the Shenzhen Intermediate People's District for the dissolution of the arbitration award.3.Ping An Bank Co., Ltd. issued a standby certificate (independent guarantee) to the offshore department of Ping An Bank according to the application of LeEcoTV Sports Company, and paid 57 million yuan to the offshore department after receiving the claim documents from the offshore department. LeEcoTV Sports Company's failure to pay off this advance payment constitutes a breach of contract, and Ping An Bank entrusts our lawyer to represent the litigation procedure of this case if it fails to recover the creditor's rights. The barrister of this firm is the lead barrister in this case, and is fully responsible for bidding for, communication and coordination, formulation of lawsuit strategy, etc.
