Partner

701 El Camino Real
Redwood City, CA, 94063, United States

+1 415 426 4731

English



Marc Belloli is an experienced trial lawyer whose practice focuses on patent litigation and patent monetization.

He has litigated more than 300 patent cases, representing both plaintiffs and defendants, with stops in all the key patent venues in Texas, Delaware and California. He handles all aspects of his cases including appeals to the Federal Circuit.

Marc has tried more than ten cases to juries. He is one of the rare patent litigators who has secured multiple nine figure jury verdicts for patent owners. In 2021, he was the architect of the damages case that resulted in a $172.5M jury verdict for Wapp Technologies against Micro Focus. In that case he also secured judgment as a matter of law against Micro Focus’s prior art defenses just before the case went to the jury, leaving the defendant essentially without any defense for the jury to consider. In 2025, he handled the damages case for TOT Power Control and secured a $110M jury verdict against Apple.

Relying on his vast patent litigation expertise, Marc also advises clients on how to value and monetize intellectual property outside of litigation.

 

Updated Oct 2025

  • TOT Power Control, S.L. v.  Apple, Samsung, LG (D. Del.): Represents patent owner in infringement litigation against mobile phone manufacturers. The patents claim important technological improvements to 3G technology that enable significant power savings, greatly increasing a mobile phone’s available bandwidth for data. Played significant role at trial, where patent owner achieved a sweeping victory against Apple in a June 2025 trial. The jury returned a verdict for $110,738,008 in damages for TOT and rejected Apple’s patent invalidity defense. The $110 million patent infringement verdict is the largest in the District of Delaware in 2025, and the third largest in the country.

  • Secure Wi-Fi LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. (E.D. Tex, PTAB): Represents patent owner Secure Wi-Fi in patent infringement litigation against Samsung. The asserted patents claim improvements to securing wireless connections, enhancing user privacy, and mitigating against security risks. Successfully persuaded the Patent Trial & Appeal Board to deny Samsung’s inter partes review petitions. Also defeated Samsung’s motion to stay the federal court case while its IPRs were pending. Co-lead trial counsel in Secure Wi-Fi’s jury trial against Samsung in December 2025.

  • Metarail, Inc. v. Google LLC (N.D. Cal., PTAB): Represents patent owner Metarail in patent infringement litigation against Google. The four asserted patents claim improvements to deep-link technology, a feature essential to e-commerce websites. Defeated Google’s inter partes review petitions by successfully persuading the Patent Trial & Appeal Board that Google had not demonstrated “a reasonable likelihood that it would prevail in showing the unpatentability of at least one challenged claim” as to the four patents. The case will now proceed to discovery and claim construction.

  • VideoLabs vs. TCL Technology, Hisense (E.D. Tex.): Represents patent owner VideoLabs in patent infringement litigation against TCL and Hisense. The asserted patents (seven against TCL, nine against Hisense) claim improvements to conditional access and digital rights management and H.264 video coding technology.

  • Intellectual property

  • Technology and telecommunications

  • B.A. Economics - University of Pennsylvania - 2003
  • J.D. - UC Law San Francisco - 2006

  • California - 2006